Legal Opinion
Benefield v. C.O. McDowall
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 5, 2001No. 00-1097PublishedCited by 135 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir.R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Defendant-Appellant C.O. McDowall appeals the district court’s ruling denying her qualified immunity in this action brought by Plaintiff-Appellee Lonnie Benefield pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by135 opinions
- DeSpain v. UphoffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Tyrone Calhoun v. George E. DetellaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Irving v. DormireCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Garrett v. StratmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Peter Bistrian v. Troy LeviCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.