Peterson v. Jasmanka
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ I] Monica Clark, as the personal representative of the estate of Lester Jas-manka, appeals from a district court order denying her motion to vacate a 1990 default judgment quieting title to certain mineral interests in Jack and Eugene Peterson. We affirm, concluding (1) the 1990 judgment was not void and therefore could not be vacated under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(4), and (2) the motion to vacate the judgment for fraud and misrepresentation under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(3) was untimely.
I
[¶ 2] Lester Jasmanka owned land in Mountrail County. In 1952, Jasmanka executed a warranty…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Shull v. WalckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Lucas v. PorterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Estate of Christeson v. GilstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Estate of Christeson v. GilstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Burris Carpet Plus, Inc. v. BurrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nelson v. McAlester Fuel CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Capps v. WeflenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Hall v. HallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Don's Garden Center v. The Garden DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- People of Michigan v. Artur GrigoryanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016