Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Jasmanka

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2014No. 20130162PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ I] Monica Clark, as the personal representative of the estate of Lester Jas-manka, appeals from a district court order denying her motion to vacate a 1990 default judgment quieting title to certain mineral interests in Jack and Eugene Peterson. We affirm, concluding (1) the 1990 judgment was not void and therefore could not be vacated under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(4), and (2) the motion to vacate the judgment for fraud and misrepresentation under N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(3) was untimely.

I

[¶ 2] Lester Jasmanka owned land in Mountrail County. In 1952, Jasmanka executed a warranty…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Shull v. WalckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Lucas v. PorterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Estate of Christeson v. GilstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Estate of Christeson v. GilstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Burris Carpet Plus, Inc. v. BurrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nelson v. McAlester Fuel CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Capps v. WeflenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Hall v. HallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Don's Garden Center v. The Garden DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  5. People of Michigan v. Artur GrigoryanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API