Legal Opinion
Pena v. Chater
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 30, 1997No. 95 Civ. 3960(JES)PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), plaintiff Miguel Pena (“Pena”) brings the instant action challenging the decision of defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the “Commissioner”) denying his application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) disability benefits. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), Pena and the Commissioner cross-move for judgment on the pleadings. For the reasons set forth below, Pena’s motion is denied and the Commissioner’s motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Miguel Pena was born in…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Elmer G. Berry v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- George MONGEUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- BRIGHT-JACOBS v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004
- Esteves v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
- Hawkins v. BarnhartDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Atkins v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021
- Badaszewski v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.