Legal Opinion
Esteves v. Barnhart
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided June 28, 2007No. 04-CV-00708PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VICTOR E. BIANCHINI, United States Magistrate Judge.
1. Plaintiff Bernardo Esteves challenges an Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) determination that he is not entitled to Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under the Social Security Act (“the Act”). Plaintiff alleges he has been disabled since September 20, 2001, because of post traumatic stress disorder, and problems with his hands, feet, back, and shoulder. Plaintiff contends his symptoms have rendered him unable to engage in any level of substantial gainful activity. He therefore asserts that he is entitled to payment…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Elmer G. Berry v. Richard Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- BULAVINETZ v. AstrueDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- Foley v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022
- Mazyck v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020
- Panfil v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021
- Zawistowski v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020