Legal Opinion

Gellman Bros. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 20, 1939No. C. D. 82PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sullivan, Judge:

The merchandise in question appears on the invoice as follows:

2151 400 grs. paper flying bird only, ¥1.52_ ¥608. 00-

⅜ * * ⅜ ⅜* * *

2151 400 Grs. 33" decorated bamboo stick for flying bird, ¥.50— ¥200. 00'

Above the item of "bamboo stick” is written in red ink, evidently by the examiner, “For above bird.” The two items are joined by a red ink bracket, outside of which is written in red ink “Toys, n. s. p. f_ @ 70% Par. 1513.”

The protest is against the assessment of duty by the collector at-St. Paul, Minn., on the “Bamboo sticks” only, and claims that they are free of duty under…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Altman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Hartranft v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Bough v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gallagher & Ascher Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. Standard Brands Paint Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API