Legal Opinion

Standard Brands Paint Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 24, 1973No. C.D. 4477; Court No. 72-4-00772PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Watson, Judge:

This civil action raises in a somewhat novel manner the question of “entireties”. The central dispute is whether the *76importations are to be considered for tariff purposes as separate parts or in some more unified form. The importations consist of separate packages of wooden picture frame moldings in a range of styles and lengths. Each package contains two equal lengths of molding with their ends mitered (cut at an angle for joining purposes) and two nails. They were classified as wood moldings pursuant to item 202.66 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, as modified by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. SchoverlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. United States v. IrwinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
  3. Authentic Furniture Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  4. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. Bendix Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bendix Mouldings, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
  2. Standard Brands Paint Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API