Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. West, Atty. Gen. v. Breckinridge

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 2, 1912No. 3070PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Original proceedings by the State, on the relation of Charles West, Attorney General, for quo warranto to M. A. Breckinridge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

This is an original proceeding in quo warranto, brought in this court by the state, upon the relation of the Attorney General, to oust the defendant M. A. Breck-inridge from the office of judge of the superior court of Tulsa county. The case consists of amended petition, answer, reply, and proof in the form of depositions.

The grounds alleged, in the amended petition, for ousting the defendant are: First. That the defendant was not eligible at the time of his appointment, or at the time of his qualification, to become judge of the superior court, because at such times he…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Lamb & TynerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. State ex rel. Schuet v. MurrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Searcy v. GrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. State ex rel. Nourse v. ClarkeNevada Supreme Court · 1867

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. SlinkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Baskin v. State Ex Rel. ShortSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Slater v. VarneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Herndon v. Excise Board of Garfield CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. State Ex Rel. Dostert v. RigglemanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1972

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API