Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Henry v. First Exchange Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 6, 2013No. 1111353Published

1ConcurrenceMoore, Chief Justice

I concur with the decision of the Court to deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. I write specially to explain my reasons for denying the petition: (1) the petitioners’ delay in moving to strike the demand for a jury trial and (2) the unconstitutionality of predispute contractual jury waivers as violating the right to a jury trial.

I. DELAY IN MOVING TO STRIKE JURY DEMAND

First Exchange Bank, Farmers Exchange Bank, and Dan Thomas, the defendants below (“the petitioners”), seek a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to enter an order striking the jury demand of Thomas Henry and Darla…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  5. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API