Henry v. First Exchange Bank
Supreme Court of Alabama
1ConcurrenceMoore, Chief Justice
I concur with the decision of the Court to deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. I write specially to explain my reasons for denying the petition: (1) the petitioners’ delay in moving to strike the demand for a jury trial and (2) the unconstitutionality of predispute contractual jury waivers as violating the right to a jury trial.
I. DELAY IN MOVING TO STRIKE JURY DEMAND
First Exchange Bank, Farmers Exchange Bank, and Dan Thomas, the defendants below (“the petitioners”), seek a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to enter an order striking the jury demand of Thomas Henry and Darla…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.