Legal Opinion

United States v. Neder

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 19, 1998No. 92-2929PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULL, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Ellis E. Neder, Jr. appeals his convictions on various false statement, fraud, conspiracy, and racketeering offenses. Ned-er contends that the district court erred in failing to submit the issue of materiality to the jury with respect to his fraud and false statement offenses. 1 After review, we affirm.

I. FACTS

A. Neder’s Fraudulent Activities

Between 1984 and 1988, Neder engaged in fraudulent activities related to land acquisition, land development, and construction projects. Through his schemes, Neder fraudulently obtained over $80 million in loans from various…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Yates v. EvattSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chester McCoy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Luiz Ben Zvi and Roz Ben ZviCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. GreggCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Ellis E. Neder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  5. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API