Legal Opinion
Ex Parte: Hawthorne and Mahoney
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided July 5, 1934PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Statement of Controversy.
Two petitions for habeas corpus were allowed by this Court to1 have brought before it for consideration the alleged illegality of detention of petitioners, N. Vernon Hawthorne and Dan J. Mahoney, on information filed against them and under capiases issued by the Criminal Court of Record of Dade County. Both informations were alike, with the exception that one isi against the party who spoke over the radio while the other is against a newspaper publisher who carried an account of the text of the speech in his newspaper as a matter of current news.
The information…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- State ex rel. Merrill v. GerowSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- State Ex Rel. Barnett v. Gray, Secy. of StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Harris v. BeloteSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Waite v. GraySupreme Court of Florida · 1932
3Cited by22 opinions
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Limpus v. NewellSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- City of St. Petersburg v. CalbeckDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
- Lieberman v. MarshallSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- Bowden v. CarterSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.