Legal Opinion
Smith v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided June 17, 1970No. 39219PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
237 So.2d 139 (1970)
James Clyde SMITH, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 39219.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 17, 1970.
Robert M. Lloyd, of Fee, Parker & Neill, Fort Pierce, for appellant.
Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
DREW, Justice.
The trial court ruled in the trial of this cause that Florida Statutes, Section 317.221(1) (1967), F.S.A.,[1] was constitutional, found the appellant [defendant below] guilty of the offenses charged under the statute, and imposed an appropriate sentence. It is from this judgment of conviction and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Brock v. HardieSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
- State v. LantzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Orlando Sports Stadium, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
- State v. WershowSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Newman v. CarsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- State v. DavenportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- Sarasota County v. BargSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.