Legal Opinion

Villa v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 8, 1983PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice:

Hector A. Villa appeals the revocation of his driver’s license following the Superior Court’s declaration that he was an habitual offender of the motor vehicle laws of this State (21 Del.C., ch. 28). Villa argues that the procedure by which habitual offender status is determined is criminal in nature and a direct punishment for a traffic infraction. He also contends that the magistrate who accepted his latest guilty plea to a traffic offense failed to warn him (1) that he would be subject to further action as an habitual offender and (2) of the possible outcome of such…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Hawker v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. State v. ScheffelWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Prichard v. BattleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  5. Anderson v. Commissioner of HighwaysSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. CarneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  2. State v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  3. Tarr v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  4. Cook v. OberlyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1983
  5. Stoltz v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API