Legal Opinion

Tarr v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 12, 1984PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

The defendant, Martha P. Tarr, appeals her conviction in the Superior Court of first degree vehicular homicide. She contends that the State was precluded by the double jeopardy clauses of the United States and Delaware Constitutions 1 from bringing the charge against her because of her earlier election to participate in a first offender’s program for those charged with drunken driving.

We conclude that the defendant is not entitled to the protection she seeks. Jeopardy for vehicular homicide did not attach when she voluntarily chose to enroll in the first offender’s program, a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hughey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  2. Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  3. Krewson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  4. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2020
  5. Krewson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API