Legal Opinion

Weyerhaeuser v. Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 24, 2004No. 29622-5-IIPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, J.

Concerned Residents on Waste Disposal (CROWD) appeals from a declaratory judgment in favor of Land Recovery, Inc., (LRI) and the Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department (TPCHD) concerning the application of Substitute Senate Bill (SSB) 5729 to the construction of a landfill. We hold that the trial court correctly construed the phrase “landfill facility” and the term “construction.” We also hold that LRI’s activities in drilling *62permanent wells in 1998, prior to bill’s passage on April 27, 1999, constituted “construction” such that LRI was not a “wholly new solid waste landfill” facility and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Western Telepage, Inc. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Western Telepage, Inc. v. City of Tacoma Department of FinancingWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. American Continental Insurance v. SteenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. American Continental Ins. Co. v. SteenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Pilcher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hegwine v. Longview Fibre Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  2. Hegwine v. Longview Fibre Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. Barker v. Advanced Silicon Materials, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. Barker v. Advanced Silicon Materials, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. State Of Washington v. Living Essentials, Llc, Et Ano.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API