Legal Opinion

Escovedo v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided June 15, 1995No. 01-94-00485-CRPublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’CONNOR, Justice.

The primary issue in this appeal is whether a trial court is required to give an instruction on reasonable doubt regarding an extraneous offense at punishment. We hold it must.

A jury found the appellant, Andrew J. Escovedo, guilty of aggravated robbery and assessed punishment at 20 years in prison. We affirm.

Facts

The complainant, Victoria Cortinez, worked part-time at the Gutierrez Food Market, located at 7313 Market Street in Houston. She was the only employee in the store during her shift from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. On February 9, 1994, she opened the store about…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Arline v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Poole v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  3. Splawn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
  4. Yates v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
  5. Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API