Escovedo v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’CONNOR, Justice.
The primary issue in this appeal is whether a trial court is required to give an instruction on reasonable doubt regarding an extraneous offense at punishment. We hold it must.
A jury found the appellant, Andrew J. Escovedo, guilty of aggravated robbery and assessed punishment at 20 years in prison. We affirm.
Facts
The complainant, Victoria Cortinez, worked part-time at the Gutierrez Food Market, located at 7313 Market Street in Houston. She was the only employee in the store during her shift from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. On February 9, 1994, she opened the store about…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Arline v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Poole v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Splawn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
- Yates v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
- Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.