Legal Opinion

Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. Nearseal Unhairing Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided July 17, 1901Published

In Equity. Suit for infringement of patent. On motion for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, District Judge.

The bilfis filed to enjoirthe infringement of claim 8 of letters patent No. 383,258, issued May 22, 1888, to John W. Sutton. The complainants have succeeded to the rights under the patent, and the present motion is for an injunction pending final hearing. Claim 8 is as follows:

“8. The combination of a fixed stretcher bar, means for intermittently feeding the shin over the same, a stationary card above the stretcher bar. a rotary separating brush below the same, and mechanism, substantially as described, whereby the rotary brush is moved upward and forward into a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. BowskyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1899
  2. Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Unhairing Mach. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1900
  3. Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. MischkeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API