Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Unhairing Mach. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
In Equity. Suits for infringement of patent. On rehearing. For former opinions, see 95 Fed. 474, 98 Fed. 297, and 99 Fed. 1003.
1Opinion of the Court
TOWNSEND, District Judge.
This opinion relates to three cases, namely, this complainant against Max Bowsky, Karl Mischke, and the American Unhairing Machine Company. The defendant Mischke constructed the machines used by the defendant the American Un-hairing Machine Company. The suit against Max Bowsky after final hearing was decided in favor of this complainant as to the eighth claim of the Sutton patent. Afterwards the case of this complainant against Karl Mischke, upon practically the same testimony, was opened, and evidence was introduced as to a machine known as the “Covert Machine,” and…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Fur Refining Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1902
- In re RobertshawCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
- Nutter v. MossbergU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1902
- Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Fur Refining Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1903
- Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. Nearseal Unhairing Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1901