Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Cohen

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 13, 1909No. Civ. No. 535PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County refusing to change the place of trial. C. ,W. Norton, Judge. The facte are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The court below made an order declining to grant the motion of the defendants for a change of the place of trial, and this appeal is taken by said defendants from said order.

The defendants appeared and demurred to the complaint specifically and generally, and at the same time filed an affidavit of merits and the demand required by section 398 of the Code of Civil Procedure and gave notice of their intention to move for a change of the place of trial to the county of Alameda.

The action was instituted for the purpose of recovering against the appellants judgment for the sum of $498.15, alleged…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. McKenzie v. BarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Quigley v. GillettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. McDonald v. California Timber Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. San Diego Realty Co. v. CornellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fuller v. LindenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Gordon v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Sourbis v. RhoadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. California Collection Agency, Inc. v. FontanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Bernou v. BernouCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API