Bernou v. Bernou
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County refusing to change the place of trial. G. W. Nicol, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying the defendant’s motion for a change of the place of trial of this action.
The plaintiff, on the twenty-ninth day of July, 1909, filed a complaint for a divorce from defendant in the superior court in and for the county of Tuolumne. On the twelfth day of November, 1909, the defendant filed a general demurrer to the complaint and at the same time filed a demand and notice of motion for a change of the place of trial of the action from Tuolumne county to the city and county of San Francisco. Said motion was based upon the ground that the “defendant is now,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Henderson v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
3Cited by12 opinions
- Johnston v. BentonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Williams v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Schwerin v. McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Parker Co., Inc. v. Exeter Refining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- O'Brien v. O'BrienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.