Legal Opinion

Jorgensen v. Knutson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 16, 2002No. C8-01-1685PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

After respondents insureds and the accident victim entered into a Miller-Shugart agreement, the victim brought this action against respondents as defendants and appellant insurer as garnishee. Appellant moved for summary judgment on the ground that there was no coverage on the date of the accident because the insureds had been sent a notice canceling their policy for nonpayment of the premium; respondents moved for partial summary judgment on the ground that the notice of cancellation was void. The district court denied appellant’s motion and granted partial summary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. St. Paul Pioneer PressSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  2. O'MALLEY v. Ulland Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. Alton M. Johnson Co. v. M.A.I. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Osgood v. Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Brownsdale Cooperative Ass'n v. Home Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jorgensen v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  2. Jorgensen v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API