Legal Opinion
Eye Encounter, Inc. v. Contour Art, Ltd.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 20, 1979No. 78 C 980PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*686MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEAHER, District Judge.
The motion before the court is proof that “[t]he goals of efficient judicial administration are retarded, not advanced, when the pleadings are used as a battleground for legal skirmishes without the necessary factual development upon which to focus a decision,” particularly in an action based upon asserted violations of the antitrust laws. Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 561 F.2d 434, 446 (3 Cir. 1977). Defendants move for dismissal of the action pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), F.R.Civ.P., or, in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to Rules 12 and…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Grams v. BossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Charlotte Fusco and Daniel Boe v. Xerox CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- CBS, Inc. v. AhernDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Robert's Waikiki U-Drive, Inc. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1980
- Strobl v. New York Mercantile ExchangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.