Legal Opinion
Strobl v. New York Mercantile Exchange
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 12, 1983No. 79 Civ. 1834 (LFM)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MacMAHON, Senior District Judge.
Defendant New York Mercantile Exchange (“the Exchange”) moves to reargue its motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P., or, in the alternative, to dismiss the complaint. Plaintiff moves to reinstate his claims under the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEA”), as amended by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission Act (“CFTCA”).
This action against numerous defendants was commenced on April 6,1979. The complaint makes five claims in six “counts.” Count 1 states that “this action is brought…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Universal City Studios, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Nintendo Co., Ltd. And Nintendo of America, Inc., CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Nordic Bank PLC v. Trend Group, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Taylor v. Bear Stearns & Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1983
- Kolbeck v. LIT America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Resource Developers, Inc. v. Statue of Liberty-Ellis Island Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.