Legal Opinion
Sabel v. Mead & Johnson Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 22, 1986No. Civ. A. No. 84-3753-WPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ON MOTION OF PLAINTIFF, PAUL D. SABEL TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES PURSUANT TO FED.R. CIV.P. 37 (# 15)
ROBERT B. COLLINGS, United States Magistrate.
The question raised by the plaintiff Paul Sabel’s motion to compel answers to interrogatories is whether or not the defendant has properly invoked the option provided by Rule 33(c), F.R.Civ.P., in answering certain of the interrogatories which have been propounded to it.
The Complaint alleges that the defendant - manufactures a drug known as trazodone which it markets under the name desyrel. The plaintiff Paul Sabel claims that he…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Daiflon, Inc. v. Allied Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Al Barnett & Son, Inc. v. Outboard Marine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Budget Rent-A-Car of Missouri, Inc. v. Hertz Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1972
- Pascale v. G. D. Searle & Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1981
- In re Master KeyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- O'Connor v. Boeing North American, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1999
- Blake Associates, Inc. v. Omni Spectra, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
- Brugaletta v. GarciaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
- Sabel v. Mead Johnson & Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1986
- Decelle, Inc. v. B&M Realty Nominee TrustMassachusetts Superior Court · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.