Legal Opinion

Sabel v. Mead Johnson & Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 8, 1986No. Civ. A. No. 84-3753-WPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO F.R.CIV.P. 37(b)(2)(A) (# 71)

ROBERT B. COLLINGS, United States Magistrate.

Plaintiff Paul D. Sabel’s Motion For Sanctions, Etc. (# 71) is a further chapter in the ongoing battle between the parties over the adequacy of defendant’s answers to plaintiff’s interrogatories. Sabel v. Mead Johnson & Co., 110 F.R.D. 553 (D.Mass., 1986).

The plaintiff challenges the defendant’s further answers to interrogatories ## 7, 8, 9 & 10 and claims that the further answers do not comply with the Court’s May 22nd opinion and the Order entered the same date on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sabel v. Mead & Johnson Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Decelle, Inc. v. B&M Realty Nominee TrustMassachusetts Superior Court · 2000
  2. Premier Homes, Inc. v. Merrimack Engineering Services, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2002
  3. Torres v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API