Sabel v. Mead Johnson & Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO F.R.CIV.P. 37(b)(2)(A) (# 71)
ROBERT B. COLLINGS, United States Magistrate.
Plaintiff Paul D. Sabel’s Motion For Sanctions, Etc. (# 71) is a further chapter in the ongoing battle between the parties over the adequacy of defendant’s answers to plaintiff’s interrogatories. Sabel v. Mead Johnson & Co., 110 F.R.D. 553 (D.Mass., 1986).
The plaintiff challenges the defendant’s further answers to interrogatories ## 7, 8, 9 & 10 and claims that the further answers do not comply with the Court’s May 22nd opinion and the Order entered the same date on…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sabel v. Mead & Johnson Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1986
3Cited by3 opinions
- Decelle, Inc. v. B&M Realty Nominee TrustMassachusetts Superior Court · 2000
- Premier Homes, Inc. v. Merrimack Engineering Services, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2002
- Torres v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018