Legal Opinion

Pascale v. G. D. Searle & Co.

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided February 18, 1981No. Civ. A. No. 78-0217PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETTINE, Chief Judge.

MEMORANDUM

Discovery in this products liability case has been stymied for over two years by plaintiff’s inability to obtain satisfactory answers to interrogatories. Defendant has steadfastly maintained that it has complied fully with the discovery provisions of the federal rules by making available to plaintiff, in accordance with F.R.Civ.P. 33(c), business records from which answers to the interrogatories can be derived or ascertained.1 Plaintiff’s efforts to compel written responses to the interrogatories have resulted in two orders by the Magistrate. The first of these…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Daiflon, Inc. v. Allied Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  2. Al Barnett & Son, Inc. v. Outboard Marine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Jose A. Garcia, United States v. Pablo H. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Fischer v. McGowanDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1984
  3. T.n. Taube Corp. v. Marine Midland Mortgage Corp.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1991
  4. Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority v. Clow Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1985
  5. Blake Associates, Inc. v. Omni Spectra, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API