Legal Opinion
Lang v. Railroad Commission
California Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1935No. S. F. 15065PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
Some time prior to the ninth day of March, 1933, the Southern Pacific Company, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, the Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Company, the Pacific Electric Railway Company, the Western Pacific Railroad Company, the Sacramento Northern Railway Company, the- Tidewater Southern Railroad Company, and the Pacific Freight Tariff Bureau filed in the office of the Railroad Commission of the state of California their tariff publications or schedules of rates to be charged by said companies for hauling or transporting petroleum, petroleum products, and kindred…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Morel v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Gore v. JohnWyoming Supreme Court · 1945
- Orlinoff v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.