Legal Opinion

Zieminski v. Berkshire Division of Probate & Family Court Department

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 13, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant, Jonas Zieminski, appeals from the denial by a single justice of this court of his complaint for relief pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1988 ed.). He argues that the single justice erred in refusing to vacate the *1009action of a judge of the Berkshire Division of the Probate and Family Court Department in dismissing three appeals taken by him from judgments and orders in that court. There was no error.

Alma R. Arlos for the plaintiff. John R. Gobel for the intervener.

On October 7, 1988, identical judgments of divorce nisi were entered in the Berkshire Division of the Probate and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fogarty v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Mailer v. MailerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Hahn v. Planning Board of StoughtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. McCarthy v. O'CONNORMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  5. Tammaro v. ColarussoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Catalano v. First Essex Savings BankMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  2. Elles v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. Associated Chiropractic Services, Inc. v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
  4. Kyricopoulos v. RichardsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Rudders v. Building Commissioner of BarnstableMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API