Legal Opinion

Wilson & Co. v. Walsenburg Sand & Gravel Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 27, 1989No. 87CA1658PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TURSI, Judge.

Defendant Walsenburg Sand & Gravel Co., Inc., (WSG) appeals the sufficiency of the judgment entered on its counterclaim against the plaintiff, Wilson & Co. (Wilson). WSG also appeals the award of attorneys fees and expenses entered in favor of defendant Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (Fidelity) on Fidelity’s cross-claim against WSG. Wilson cross-appeals the dismissal of its claims against WSG and Fidelity. We affirm the judgment in its entirety.

*1387The City of Walsenburg hired Wilson to perform engineering services in connection with its street improvement program. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Page v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  2. Central Towers Apartments, Inc. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  3. Denver Publishing Co. v. KirkColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Hotchkiss v. PrebleColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Superior Companies v. Kaiser Cement Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ideal Electronic Security Co. v. International Fidelity InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  2. Carder, Inc. v. CashColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Friedman v. Colorado National Bank of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. DSCO, INC. v. WarrenColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. May Department Stores Co. v. University Hills, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API