Legal Opinion

Batchelder v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 8, 1904PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

The plaintiff cannot complain of the defendants^ failure to perform the duties imposed on them by section 6, chapter 159, Public Statutes, for they were imposed on the defendants for the benefit of travelers on the highway and not for the benefit of persons traveling on their right of way. Hill v. Railroad, 67 N. H. 419; Casista v. Railroad, 69 N. H. 649; Smith v. Railroad, 70 N. H. 53, 83; Gahagan v. Railroad, 70 N. H. 441; Roden v. Railway, 133 Ill. 72.

When the plaintiff was injured she was either a licensee or a. trespasser; that is, she was either rightfully or wrongfully using the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Roden v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. French v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1904
  2. Morris v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  3. Dow v. LathamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
  4. Johnson v. Director-General of RailroadsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1924
  5. Chabott v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API