Legal Opinion

EE Bach Millwork Co. v. MEISNER AND CO.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1975No. 9070PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAND, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal granted pursuant to Rule 41(b), North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure, and entered against the plaintiff-appellant E. E. Bach Millwork Company for the reasons that appellant was not a real party in interest as contemplated by subsections (a) and (c) of Rule 17, N.D.R.Civ.P.; that appellant had failed in its proofs on a motion for substitution under Rule 25(c), N.D.R.Civ.P.; and, that the appellant, having failed to comply with Section 10-22-19, North Dakota Century Code, lacked the capacity to maintain its action in the courts of this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McGuigan v. AllenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Froling v. FarrarNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Newby v. Johnston's Fuel Liners, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Van Sickle v. McArthurNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pleasure Time, Inc. v. KussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Jablonsky v. KlemmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Reliance Insurance Co. v. Public Service CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Lovas v. St. Paul Insurance CompaniesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Olson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API