EE Bach Millwork Co. v. MEISNER AND CO.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SAND, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal granted pursuant to Rule 41(b), North Dakota Rules of Civil Procedure, and entered against the plaintiff-appellant E. E. Bach Millwork Company for the reasons that appellant was not a real party in interest as contemplated by subsections (a) and (c) of Rule 17, N.D.R.Civ.P.; that appellant had failed in its proofs on a motion for substitution under Rule 25(c), N.D.R.Civ.P.; and, that the appellant, having failed to comply with Section 10-22-19, North Dakota Century Code, lacked the capacity to maintain its action in the courts of this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McGuigan v. AllenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Froling v. FarrarNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Newby v. Johnston's Fuel Liners, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- Van Sickle v. McArthurNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by15 opinions
- Pleasure Time, Inc. v. KussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Jablonsky v. KlemmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Reliance Insurance Co. v. Public Service CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Lovas v. St. Paul Insurance CompaniesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Olson v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.