Legal Opinion

Norman Gershman's Things to Wear, Inc. v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided February 10, 1989PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Judge.

This suit involves the sale of an allegedly defective automobile to plaintiff Norman Gershman’s Things to Wear, Inc. [Gersh-man’s]. The car was distributed by defendant Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. [Mercedes] and sold to Gershman’s by defendant I.G. Burton & Co., Inc. [Burton]. In its complaint Gershman’s has alleged against both defendants breach of numerous warranties; failure of the essential purpose of the warranties; violation of Delaware’s “Lemon Law”; violation of Delaware’s Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practices Acts; negligent repair; and violation of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Stephenson v. Capano Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  4. Beal v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1973
  5. Lecates v. Hertrich Pontiac Buick Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Mercedes-Benz of North America Inc. v. Norman Gershman's Things to Wear, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  2. Anderson v. Chrysler Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Statee ex rel. Miller v. Cutty's Des Moines Camping Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  4. Frank Griffin Volkswagen, Inc. v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  5. Grand Ventures, Inc. v. WhaleySuperior Court of Delaware · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API