Legal Opinion

Mercedes-Benz of North America Inc. v. Norman Gershman's Things to Wear, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 6, 1991PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORSEY, Justice:

This suit for breach of warranty arises out of a car dealer and distributor’s refusal to refund to purchaser the car’s original purchase price and purchaser’s refusal to accept the dealer and distributor’s second “engine replacement” twenty-two months and 22,000 miles later.

In February 1984, plaintiff, “Norman Gershman’s Things to Wear, Inc.,” through Norman Gershman (“Gershman”), purchased for $58,660 a new 1984 Mercedes-Benz 500 SEC from defendant, I.G. Burton & Co., Inc. (“Burton”), a franchised Mercedes-Benz Delaware dealer. Defendant, Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Vista Chevrolet, Inc. v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Skelton v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  4. Conte v. Dwan Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  5. Storey v. CamperSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Lilly v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  2. Brett v. BerkowitzSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  3. Statee ex rel. Miller v. Cutty's Des Moines Camping Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  4. Laws v. WebbSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  5. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. WeismanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API