Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Daniels

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1980No. 529 E.D. Misc. 1980PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Pro se petitioner Willis Daniels seeks allowance of appeal from an order of the Superior Court affirming judgment of sentence on convictions of robbery and related offenses. Without considering whether to grant allowance of appeal, we direct the Public Defender of Montgomery County who represented petitioner on his direct appeal to the Superior Court to continue representation of petitioner and thus to file a proper petition for allowance of appeal.

Here petitioner proceeds pro se on allowance of appeal only because the Public Defender appointed to assist petitioner on…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HickoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Commonwealth v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. StancellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LiebelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. ByrdSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. RawlsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. WestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. GilbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API