Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hickox

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 1969PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

At trial, petitioner was represented by appointed counsel. Subsequent to trial, new counsel was appointed to represent petitioner in his appeal to the Superior Court. Such an appeal was filed and resulted in an affirmance of the judgment of sentence. Thereafter, counsel for the petitioner informed petitioner that he would proceed no further with the matter.

Rule 318(c) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Procedure requires that: “Where counsel has been assigned, such assignment shall be effective until final judgment, including any proceedings upon direct appeal.”

Petitioner’…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. DanielsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. StancellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Commonwealth v. CooleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API