Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Gilbert

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 12, 1991No. 00135PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

Appellant, Isaac Kim Gilbert, appeals the December 18, 1990 denial of his petition filed under the provisions of the Post-Conviction Relief Act. The issue presented is whether a post-conviction petitioner must automatically be granted the right to petition the Supreme Court for allowance of appeal nunc pro tunc from our prior affirmance of his criminal conviction on direct appeal, regardless of the merits of the issue foregone by direct appeal counsel. We conclude that a defendant does not automatically have that right and affirm the decision of the PCRA court, which denied…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. LawsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. HoymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Larry Gene Hull v. Robert M. Freeman, Ernest D. Preate, Jr., Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. PaddenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Commonwealth v. TannerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. ByrdSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Com. v. Mamuzich, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API