Tift v. Golden Hardware Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hawkins, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The evidence is undisputed that the defendant, T. W. Tift, is the owner of the fee-simple title to the land traversed by the spur track in question. No reason has been called to our atten tion, and we are unable to conceive of any, which would place upon an individual owning and operating a spur track such as that here involved any greater duty than that imposed upon a public utility, engaged in the business of a common carrier, owning a spur track over which adjoining owners may receive rail service. Both this court and the Court of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Yahoola River & Cane Creek Hydraulic Hose Mining Co. v. IrbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
- Healey v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Kirkland v. PitmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Coldwell Co. v. CowartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Hughes v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Haslerig v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Anderson v. BarronSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Cox v. ZuckerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Hasty v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- Ross v. Hall County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.