Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Barron

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 10, 1952No. 17734PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The plaintiffs offered, and the court allowed in evidence, a deed dated April 10, 1946, from W. W. Barron Jr. to them, except those recitals in the deed which are quoted in our statement of the facts. It is alleged in ground 4 of the amendment to the motion for new trial that the judge erred in excluding the recitals. Special ground 5 alleges that the judge also erred in charging the jury as follows: “Now, gentlemen, there was introduced in evidence on the trial of this case a deed from W. W. Barron Jr. to Guy L. Anderson and J. Pierce…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Central Railroad v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  2. McDonald v. DabneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Yahoola River & Cane Creek Hydraulic Hose Mining Co. v. IrbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
  4. Culberson v. Alabama Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. Robertson v. AbernathySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Templeton v. Kennesaw Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
  2. BX CORPORATION v. JeterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  3. Berger v. Plantation Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. Lincoln Life Insurance v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  5. Seki v. Groupon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API