Legal Opinion

Yeager v. Cooley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1932No. 22022PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The defendant contends that the plaintiff failed to make out a case that would entitle him to recover, in that there was no evidence showing any *454of the acts of negligence alleged, nor any evidence that the tractor was not equipped with a spark-arrester, or that the spark-arrester was defective, nor any evidence that the tractor was not operated in a careful and proper manner.

In an action for the recovery of damages resulting from a fire kindled on the property of the plaintiff, it is necessary that he shall show that the fire was negligently kindled or…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lawton v. . GilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. StuddardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Pulliam v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Bryant v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  5. Talmadge v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morrow v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. Pollard v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. Carstarphen v. IveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API