Yeager v. Cooley
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The defendant contends that the plaintiff failed to make out a case that would entitle him to recover, in that there was no evidence showing any *454of the acts of negligence alleged, nor any evidence that the tractor was not equipped with a spark-arrester, or that the spark-arrester was defective, nor any evidence that the tractor was not operated in a careful and proper manner.
In an action for the recovery of damages resulting from a fire kindled on the property of the plaintiff, it is necessary that he shall show that the fire was negligently kindled or…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lawton v. . GilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. StuddardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Pulliam v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Bryant v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Talmadge v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Morrow v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Southern Railway Co. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Pollard v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Carstarphen v. IveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942