Legal Opinion

Morrow v. Johnston

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 23, 1952No. 33793PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorrill, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The first special ground of the amended motion for a new trial assigns error on the following charge: “Gentlemen, there are two main questions for you to decide in this case and determine, one of which has been stated, and that is whether or not, if this house was burned, if it was destroyed by sparks caused by or emitted from the shaving pit of the defendants. If you find from the evidence in the case that though the house was burned that the burning did not originate from sparks from the shaving pit of the defendants, then you would stop there in your…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brown v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Empire Mills Co. v. Burrell Engineering & Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  3. Harrison v. KiserSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  4. Harrison v. HesterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  5. Harper v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fulghum Industries, Inc. v. Pollard Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Stanley v. SquadritoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  3. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. AzarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  4. Georgia Hydratane Gas, Inc. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  5. Marco Publications, Inc. v. Southern Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API