Helms v. Manspile
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY Chief Justice LEROY ROUNTREE HASSELL, SR.
I
In this appeal the primary issue we consider is whether alleged owners of real estate established as a matter of law that they own title to a parcel of land by adverse possession.
II
James L. Manspile and Sheri N. Graham (the Manspiles) filed a complaint against Thomas M. Helms, Barbara S. Helms, and others. The Manspiles sought a declaration that they own an easement that transverses land owned by the Helms. The Helms filed a counterclaim and, among other things, sought an adjudication that they own a "102-feet" tract of land, described as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Turner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
- Chawla v. BurgerBusters, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1998
- Dorn v. DornSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
- Robertson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1973
- Grappo v. BlanksSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kellermann v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
- Brown v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2010
- Murillo-Rodriguez v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2010
- Graham v. CookSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
- Kovalaske v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.