Legal Opinion

Guerin v. Beamer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 29, 1999No. 97CV0036; CA A102184PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

Plaintiffs filed a notice of dismissal on the day that argument was set on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The trial court granted defendant’s summary judgment motion, ruled that plaintiffs’ notice of dismissal was moot, and entered judgment for defendant. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiffs sued defendant for medical malpractice. On September 29, 1997, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. The motion was supported by defendant’s affidavit stating that he had exercised reasonable care. Plaintiffs did not respond to defendant’s motion within the 20-day period provided by ORCP 47…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Carter v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Frohnmayer v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. ArnoldOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Garrison v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Durham v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Sandgathe v. JaggerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Maxwell v. StebbinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Palmquist v. FLIR Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Ramirez v. Northwest Renal ClinicCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API