Legal Opinion

Oregon Automobile Insurance Company v. Watkins

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1973PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALLISTER, J.

The plaintiff, Oregon Automobile Insurance Company, brought this declaratory judgment proceeding asking the court to declare that it does not have to pay' a • judgment against its insured, the defendant Watkins, because the property damaged by Watkins was in his “care, custody or control.” The trial court properly found that Oregon Auto was liable under its policy;-We affirm.

It appears from the record that Oregon Auto issued a policy of general liability insurance to the defendant Watkins, an electrical contractor. Watkins contracted with KGW-TV to install additional electrical service in its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. May v. Chicago Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Oregon Farm Bureau v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Frontier Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. v. WatkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Aetna Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Lee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Topco, Inc. v. State, Dept. of HighwaysMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Penn v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Sanders v. SandersAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API