Legal Opinion

Malky v. Kiskiminetas Valley Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1924No. Appeal, No. 154PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

This appeal is brought to review an award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, approved by the court below. Payment is resisted by the insurance carrier of defendant company because, as alleged, the accident did not occur in the course of deceased’s employment, and was therefore not within the terms of the act, as held in the first instance by the referee. The controlling facts found are practically without dispute, and the question for consideration is whether the law has been properly applied to them.

In 1921, a general strike was in force throughout the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Callihan v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Dzikowska v. Superior Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Hale v. Savage Fire Brick Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Knorr v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Baum v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Totton v. Long Lake Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Dunphy v. Augustinian College of VillanovaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Butrin v. Manion Steel Barrel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Berlin v. CrawfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Jenkins v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API