Legal Opinion

State v. Cottingham

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 7, 1976No. 7620SC80PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

This is an appeal by the defendant, Frederick James Cottingham, from the same trial at which his co-defendants, Eugene McKenzie and Patricia Ann McKenzie, were also found guilty. Each of the three defendants appealed. Their attorneys caused three separate records on appeal to be filed in this Court. There should have been but one. Rule 11(d), North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. For the reasons stated by Chief Judge Brock in the opinion in State v. Patricia Ann McKenzie, case No. 7620SC74, which is filed contemporaneously herewith, defendant Cottingham’s court appointed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. TomblinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. KillianCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. KeyesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. AtkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API