Legal Opinion

State v. Whitaker

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1979No. 792SC373PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

There are fifty-seven assignments of error in the record. Defendant Whitaker argues that there are numerous small prejudicial errors that together call for a new trial. These objections include the lack of a proper identification of exhibits, conclusory statements by witnesses and leading questions. We have carefully reviewed each of the contentions of defendant Whitaker and find them to be without prejudicial effect, and we therefore decline to grant a new trial. State v. Stanfield, 292 N.C. 357, 233 S.E. 2d 574 (1977); State v. Cottingham, 30 N.C. App. 67, 226 S.E. 2d 387…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Delaware Republican State Committee v. RedfearnSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. AlfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. SladeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. BoykinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Orlando David RodriguezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  2. United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. Guzman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. State v. BordersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. State v. ShawCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API