Legal Opinion

Barrier v. . Thomas and Howard Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 1933PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

The only question presented by this appeal is whether there was error in the refusal of the trial court to allow defendants’ motion for judgment as of nonsuit, at the close of all the evidence. O. S., 567. The defendant contends:

1. That, conceding that the evidence offered by the plaintiff tended to show that its truck was parked on the highway, in the night time, without a light on its rear, in violation of C. S., 2621(77) and C. S., 2621(94), as alleged by the plaintiff, all the evidence showed that such negligence on the part of the driver of the truck was not the proximate cause of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Godfrey v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Perkins v. Spray Wood & Coal Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Conley Ex Rel. Conley v. Pearce-Young-Angel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Thomas v. Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Hughes Ex Rel. Hughes v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. King v. AllredSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. Thomas v. Thurston Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API