Legal Opinion

Union State Bank v. Woodside

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 31, 1918No. 9077PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Potta-watomie County; Leander G. Pitman, Judge. Suit by the Union State Bank against J. C. Woodside. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

The bank instituted a suit in the lower court in May, 1915, claiming in its petition to be the owner and holder of a certain promissory note for $653, which w'as secured by a chattel mortgage on certain personal property described in the petition, and attached to the petition was a copy of the note and chattel mortgage, both of which were alleged to have been executed and delivered by the defendant, J. 0. Wood-side, to the bank.

And it is further asserted that by virtue of said note and chattel mortgage it was entitled to the possession of the property described therein,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Payne v. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  2. Cobb v. Wm. Kenefick Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. First Nat. Bank of Tishomingo v. IngleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. First State Bank of Mannsville v. HowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Francis v. Guaranty State Bank of TexolaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Trader v. TraderIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Jones v. BufordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Smith v. CantnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API