Legal Opinion

FRANKLYN GESNER FINE PAINTINGS, INC. v. Ketcham

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 4, 1988No. 76132, 76133PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Presiding Judge.

Appellee sold a painting to appellant, representing it to be the work of a certain artist. When it was determined to be a forgery, appellant sued appellee on the theories of fraud, breach of contract, and conspiracy. The conspiracy count was dismissed at trial.

A jury returned a verdict for plaintiff/appellant on the fraud count, assessing general damages of $32,500, punitive damages of $6,263, and attorney fees of $31,337; no finding was made on the breach of contract count. When queried by the court, the foreman stated that it had been the jurors’ understanding that it…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Franklyn Gesner Fine Paintings, Inc. v. KetchamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Hogan v. TAYLOR COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Ketcham v. Franklyn Gesner Fine Paintings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Ketcham v. Franklyn Gesner Fine Paintings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Franklyn Gesner Fine Paintings, Inc. v. KetchamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  2. Franklyn Gesner Fine Paintings, Inc. v. KetchamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Turner v. BinswangerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API