FRANKLYN GESNER FINE PAINTINGS, INC. v. Ketcham
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
Appellee sold a painting to appellant, representing it to be the work of a certain artist. When it was determined to be a forgery, appellant sued appellee on the theories of fraud, breach of contract, and conspiracy. The conspiracy count was dismissed at trial.
A jury returned a verdict for plaintiff/appellant on the fraud count, assessing general damages of $32,500, punitive damages of $6,263, and attorney fees of $31,337; no finding was made on the breach of contract count. When queried by the court, the foreman stated that it had been the jurors’ understanding that it…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Franklyn Gesner Fine Paintings, Inc. v. KetchamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Hogan v. TAYLOR COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Ketcham v. Franklyn Gesner Fine Paintings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Ketcham v. Franklyn Gesner Fine Paintings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Franklyn Gesner Fine Paintings, Inc. v. KetchamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Franklyn Gesner Fine Paintings, Inc. v. KetchamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Turner v. BinswangerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992