Legal Opinion

Ketcham v. Franklyn Gesner Fine Paintings, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 1, 1983No. 66066PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Judge.

Franklyn Gesner sued Ray Ketcham, claiming fraud in the sale of art work allegedly painted by Martin Johnson Heade. During discovery it became apparent that the purchaser was not Gesner but Franklyn Gesner Fine Paintings, Inc. Ketcham’s motion to dismiss upon learning that Gesner was not the purchaser of the art work was denied. The trial court then granted a motion to substitute Franklyn Gesner Fine Paintings, Inc. in place of Gesner as party plaintiff. The trial court denied Ketcham’s motion to strike the substitution and his renewed motion to dismiss. Ketcham brings this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Block v. Voyager Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. The LAMAS COMPANY, INC. v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  3. Nelson v. Sing Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. Massengale v. Eva Cook Realtor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Franklyn Gesner Fine Paintings, Inc. v. KetchamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. Franklyn Gesner Fine Paintings, Inc. v. KetchamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  3. FRANKLYN GESNER FINE PAINTINGS, INC. v. KetchamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Ketcham v. Franklyn Gesner Fine Paintings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  5. Ketcham v. Franklyn Gesner Fine Paintings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API