Legal Opinion

Franklyn Gesner Fine Paintings, Inc. v. Ketcham

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 25, 1984No. 40738PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marshall, Presiding Justice.

Franklyn Gesner sued Ray Ketcham, Jr., claiming fraud and breach of contract in the sale of two paintings purportedly created by artist Martin Johnson Heade. During discovery, it became apparent that the purchaser was not Gesner, but his closely held corporation, Franklyn Gesner Fine Paintings, Inc. Ketcham’s subsequent motion to dismiss was denied, and the trial judge then granted the plaintiffs motion to substitute Franklyn Gesner Fine Paintings, Inc., in place of Gesner individually, as party plaintiff. The trial judge denied the defendant’s motion to strike the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Block v. Voyager Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  3. Gordon v. GillespieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Powell v. Ferguson Tile & Terrazzo Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  5. McGowans v. Speed Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Bulloch v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. Foskey v. Vidalia City SchoolCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. Choice Hotels International, Inc. v. Ocmulgee Fields, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. King Cotton, Ltd. v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Walden v. John D. Archbold Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API